Sections 262626 and 2 342 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b), the charge of suspension of the murder is entirely based on the statement of the accused under section 342, CRPC but nonetheless beyond doubt. His case has failed to prove if his statement personally proved the allegation. , CRPC confessed to killing Mutofi but said that due to a confrontation, Mutofi opened fire on his leg, which resulted in the shootings in the defense, which resulted in Mutofi's death, At trial, the accused was convicted and sentenced under Section 302 (b), PPC. It sentenced him to life imprisonment, saying it was a sudden simultaneous shootout between the accused and the victim. It cannot be said that the victim was shot first, and this was not the case where the defendant exercised his right to private defense, the trial court affirmed the purpose and part of the account established by the prosecution in which the prosecutor Two witnesses were found. Be the witness of the case and not credible The trial court proceeded to decide the case in light of the recorded evidence and to hold the defendants' statement that in the absence of an ocular account, section 342 on the evidence of the investigating officer. Depending on the cost of the statement of the accused. , CRC survived the trial court's notice when the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond doubt, the defendant's sentence suspended in circumstances until his main appeal was finally allowed to be resolved. Not given
