Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FARID KHAN versus STATE


Guaranteed offense under Section 7/7/8 BB, Enforcement Hood (Ordinance) Ordinance, 1979 1979 1979 present because it is present to suppose that the accused applicant is sentenced to death, life imprisonment or ten years or He was not guilty of any more imprisonment.

1982 S C M R 949

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafi‑ur‑Rehman, JJ

FARID KHAN‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 73 of 1982 in Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1982, decided on 20th March, 1982.

(Against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 25‑1‑1982, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 3305‑B/81).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

-----S. 497/498‑Bail‑Offence under S. 11, Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979‑Reasons present for believing that accused petitioner was not guilty of offence punishable with death, life imp risonment or imprisonment of ten years or more‑Accused‑petitioner allowed bail.

Malik Allah Yar Khan, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.

S. D. Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Date of hearing : 20th March, 1982.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑

The petitioner who is accused of offence under section 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, seeks Leave to Appeal against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 25‑1‑1982, rejecting his bail application. .

2. We issued notice to the State. The case has come up for hearing again.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State. We do not wish to make any observation which may prejudice the case of either of the parties at the trial. Suffice it to say that there appears to be reasons for believing that the petitioner is not guilty offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or 10 years' R. I. or more. We, therefore, convert the petition into appeal and allow the same.

4. The petitioner is granted bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Chinniot.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.