Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ASGHAR ALI versus STATE


Read with Articles 497 and 498, Partial Regulation (XLV of 1860); Applicants accused of Sections 420, 467 and 468/47/109 have not been given the proper opportunity to present and explain the allegations against them while some partners The accused were not arrested by the police while seeking bail before arrest along with other important accused, the accused is also entitled to bail in the circumstances of the applicant case

1982 S C M R 948

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafi‑ur‑Rehman and M. S. H. Qureshi, JJ

ASGHAR ALI‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 35 of 1982 in Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 1982, decided on 16th February, 1982.

(Against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 24‑1‑1982 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 3396‑B/1981).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑--

Ss. 497 & 498 read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 420, 467 & 468/47/109‑Bail‑Accused petitioner not given sufficient opportunity of appearing and explaining allegations against him‑Some co‑accused not arrested by Police while others including main accused obtaining bail before arrest‑Held, accused petitioner also entitled to bail in circumstances of case.

Sh. Abdul Mannan, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Rashid Aziz, Additional Advocate‑General with Sh. Ijaz Ali, Advocate‑on -Record for the State.

Date of hearing : 16th February, 1982.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.

‑The petitioner is accused alongwith 18 others of offences under sections 420/467/468/47/109, P. P. C. read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, on the basis of a report made by the Collector, Kasur, as a result of the inquiry relating to the alleged forgery and cheating in respect of sale of State .land. The petitioner applied for bail before' arrest before the High Court through Cr. Misc. No. 3396/B/81 which was dismissed vide the impugned order dated 24‑1‑1982. He applied for Leave to Appeal against the said order.

2. After going through the file relating to the inquiries by the Collector we notice that the petitioner was not given sufficient opportunity of appearing and explaining the allegations against him, the petitioner has been involved in the case. Some of the accused are not being arrested by the police while others have obtained bail before arrest. Even Sarwar Baig the main accused has been released on pre‑arrest bail after this petition was filed.

3. After considering the facts and circumstances of this case we feel that the petitioner, too, is entitled to the concession of bail. We, therefore, convert this petition into appeal and allow the same.

4. The petitioner is granted bail before arrest in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Com missioner, Kasur.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Akhora Khattak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.