Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus STATE


Section 4 35 ? The unusual nature of the woman and the tearing of the woman who has been slapped and dragged, which has been observed by a Muslim woman, is equivalent to the humiliation of a woman under the consideration of section 354.

1982 S C M R 951

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

MUSHTAQ AHMED‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 119 of 1982, decided on 17th April, 1982.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 22‑3‑1982 of the Lahore High Court in Crimi.9al Revision No. 159 of 1982).

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑

‑‑ S. 354‑Outraging modesty of a woman‑Slapping and pulling and, tearing of burqa of purdah‑observing Muslim lady‑Held, amounts to outraging modesty of a woman within contemplation of S. 354.

Malik Sher Bahadur, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Abdul Karim Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 17th April, 1982.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.

‑This petition is directed against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in Criminal Revision No. 159 of 1982.

2. The petitioner Mushtaq Ahmad was convicted and sentenced to two years R. I under section 354, P. P. C. by the Special Railway Magistrate Ist Class, Lahore, by his order dated 21‑9‑1981. On appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore, maintained the conviction and reduced the sentence to six months R. I. vide judgment dated 13‑3‑1982. He then filed a revision petition before the Lahore High Court but the same was also dismissed on 22‑3‑1982. Hence this petition.

3. The main submission of Malik Sher Bahadur, learned Advocate for the petitioner, is that the offence under section 354, P. P. C. was not made out, even if the facts alleged by the prosecution were accepted. He submitted that the allegation against the petitioner was that he had slapped the complainant and even if this was so the petitioner could not be found guilt under section 354, P. P. C. But we, however, find that in the evidence of the complainant the allegation also is that when the petitioner slapped her, Mst. Bashiran Bibi P. W. tried to push her away, whereupon h pulled her Burqa which got torn from the front side. The pulling and tearing of Burqa of a pardah observing Muslim lady amounts to outraging the modesty of a woman within the contemplation of section 354, P. P. C.

This petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Dadakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.