Section 22 and 24 (b) suit for the specific performance of the contract in relation to the immovable property pay the balanced consideration of the court's discretion to issue such litigation as the essence of the agreement between the parties and the jurisdictional parties. Agree to. The effect of the parties at the time of the contract, the sale of the real estate with the sellers / claimants, the buyers paid a considerable amount of money at the execution of the contract. The agreement specifically states that the balance must be considered. By a certain date and if it is not done, the balance will be forfeited and the contract will be redeemed. If sellers withdraw from the contract, then the buyer will have the right to seek specific performance of the contract through a court of law. If there is a legal impediment / impairment in the deal's performance in this case, it will be automatically canceled. Buyers have failed to consider the balance within the stipulated time, after which the seller sends them a notice stating. That the contract is terminated depending on it. The timely clause buyers filed against the sellers for the specific performance of the contract asserted that the agreement could not be finalized and the balance could not be considered within time because the other party in relation to the suit land. There was litigation against the sellers and an interim order was approved. For them, the suit was rejected by the civil court on the basis that the contract was the essence of the agreement to consider the balance at the time. The High Court set aside the civil court's decision and bought it.