Article 184 (3) Investigating the issue of human rights under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution Act, raised by the Supreme Court on a news clip related to the rape of a deaf and dumb woman by the Supreme Court. The criminal negligence of the police authorities, it was found that the concerned district police officer could not properly investigate the investigation made by his juniors for being in a guard position and forgave the culprits because the victim and his There is a contradiction in the statements of the complainant's brother. According to the accused victim, the rape was committed by three suspects while his brother (complainant) said he was one of the first offenders to be involved in police scouting for his involvement. Was allowed Prosecutor) The statement obtained from the complainant stated in the affidavit that he had given such oath under the influence, the medical report of the victim cannot be ruled out because of the incident. Due to the criminal negligence of a police officer. Who was deaf and dumb, he was subjected to criminal activity and the police, aware of his negligence, tried to cover up his faults. The court directed that the provincial inspector general of police should initiate criminal proceedings against all concerned illegal police officers / officers, including the concerned district police. The officer should ensure that an independent investigation is carried out as soon as possible and without affecting the side of everyone involved in the case; that disciplinary action is initiated against the concerned district police officer and other suspects.
