Find a Lawyer

NOOR DIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE

Challenging the gift suit verification of the Section 3 civil suit, the property owner died in 1951, and his daughters transferred their inheritance from their brother to his brother. Forty (40) years after the gift of the transformative effect, such a lawsuit was banned from the face on the record by a civil suit and no evidence was required to be registered. Its legal heritage was that after the Revenue Record of 1971, the suit property was enjoyed, that neither the daughters nor their legal heirs had any share in the production of the suit property nor the leave on appeal. The application for was changed and allowed in the appeal, and the challenge of gifted change over time is justified. Deleted as valid

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD ZAHID v. Dr. MUHAMMAD ALI 2014 PLD 488
• LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ALICON LIMITED, LAHORE 2014 PLD 494
• Mst. NASEEM BEGUM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 506
• LIAQAT ALI KHAN v. FALAK SHER 2014 PLD 506
• HUMAN RIGHTS CASE NO.42389-P OF 2013 2014 SCMR 515
• SYNTRON LIMITED v. HUMA IJAZ 2014 SCMR 531
• PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary v. M.Q.M. through Deputy Convener 2014 PLD 531
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. v. MEMBER NIRC 2014 SCMR 535

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates phone number from Okara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes