FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES versus DURRANI CERAMICS
Article 188 and Fourth Schedule, Part 1, Entry No. 51 Review Requests appear in the Federal Legislative List, interpreting the legislative history of such registrations, compatibility of taxes on mineral oil, natural gas and energy production In the decision under consideration by the Government for the Terminology of Minerals, and the Scope Government, it was claimed that in Part I, Entry No. 51 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution, the word natural gas and \ minerals \ words appeared between the words \ and \. Is. As pre or and the Supreme Court in its decision, declared that there was no ambiguity in the interpretation of Entry No. 51, Part 1 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution, and should be given its general meaning. That if the legislature wants it to give the words of entry accuracy their common meaning, unless the context is required, the legislative history of the entry into the Federal Legislative List will not be relevant. If the item 4 contains the ambiguous words used in Part 1, Entry No. 51, there is no difficulty in translating it or creating a joke when their common meanings are given. No need to look for historical reference references. In view of the true meaning of Registration No. 51 of Part I of the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution, the Supreme Court upheld the construction already laid on Part I, Entry No. 51 of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution; Accordingly excluded. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
