Find a Lawyer

REGISTRAR, PESHAWAR HIGH COURT versus SHAFIQ AHMAD TANOLI

Sections 5 and 8 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial Service Rules, 2001, RR 4 and 10 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol 1, Chapter 10, Part A, R1 Subordinate / District Judiciary (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) Seniority Legal Responsibility Determination of Appointments The appointment of the Chief Justice of the High Court (Peshawar) High Court District Judges and Determination of his superannuation was a legal duty to be used by the Chief Justice of Administration Committee of the High Court. ? The High Court could not do anything about it. Any decision of the High Court Management Committee (in the matter of appointment of members of the District Judiciary and their determination to excel) shall be binding on the Chief Justice. High court

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• WAPDA v. BASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH 2015 PLD 344
• Mian KHALID RAUF v. Chaudhry MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2015 PLD 348
• ALI HASSAN BROHI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2015 SCMR 353
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources v. DURRANI CERAMICS 2015 PLD 354
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR ALI v. ASIM GULZAR 2015 SCMR 365
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. PARADISE TRADING COMPANY 2015 CLD 366
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary and Director General, Excise and Taxation v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 2015 PLD 380
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. NOOR-UN-NISA 2015 SCMR 380

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

advocates from Rabwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes