MUHAMMAD ASHRAF SANGRI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 7 Constitution Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Central Superior Services (CSS) Examination Board Candidate Interview Written Examination of CSS Exam passed but failed Vivo Voice / Interview Interview taken by candidate Accordingly, he did not evaluate whether the validity of the procedure during the interview was a subjective test and it was not possible for any court to substitute his opinion for the interview board's opinion, so that the candidate could be relieved of the interview. What happened during and what convinced a board member? The issue of giving him the marks award number was something the court was not authorized to investigate. The High Court could not change its individual opinion from the opinion of the interviewing board if there was any corruption or prejudice or a wrong record of the decision in that case. Floating on the surface of , The High Court would have to intervene, because instead of questioning the fitness of any candidate of a court, the courts were more aware of such mistakes. The ARP, which was a by-product case and could best be assessed by those entrusted with such responsibility, refused to intervene as a result of a candidate announced by the Public Service Commission.
