ASIF YOUSAF versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, CBR, ISLAMABAD
Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Major Penalty Showcase Notice, Large fine of dismissal from employment of a civil servant on the non-issuance of competent authority; was not. By agreeing with the Inquiry Officer regarding the award of the penalty and extending the punishment beyond the recommendation of the Inquiry Officer, the competent authority had to first give the accused officer a chance to be heard and secondly, he consciously A reasonable order had to be passed with the request, even though the inquiry officer was found not guilty of negligence in dealing with the civil servant and the \ mill management of, yet the competent authority found him guilty of a large dismissal of employment. That there was sufficient evidence on record to prove the allegations whose evidence or m There is no reference to them. There was no record on the record of the dismissal of the employment which the competent authority supported in favor of awarding the record that the accused public servant was guilty of corruption or financial gain. The Supreme Court rejected the order passed by the competent authority and obtained further remand for the decision after the permission of the public servant's appeal. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
