CANTONMENT BOARD THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CANTT. BOARD, RAWALPINDI versus IKHLAQ AHMED
Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suit for Specific Performance of the Contract, concludes the factual conclusions of the High Court in relation to the three leasehold rights in respect of this plot in the plaintiff's amending jurisdiction. A specific contract performance suit has been filed. It was affirmed in his favor that the trial case was decided by the trial court by the lower appellate court as well as by the high court. The High Court exercised its jurisdiction to amend, under section 115, CPC, which intended to gain effective and secure authority. Its supervision and doctrinal capabilities cannot be prosecuted without the technical skills of the law or the final jurisdiction of the facts, which did not in any way affect the jurisdiction of the court. Could not investigate or exercise its jurisdiction on the basis of facts or grounds, which had already been proved by the parties by the evidence already proved that the decision to inspect under such action was unimaginable. Subsequent searches were justified in not interfering with what was on record Was based on the evidence and the proper definition of the High Court's decision was no error. What could have been an interference warrant by a Supreme Court petition was dropped
