Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB

The candidate for higher education is required by the Revenue Officer as per the guidelines laid down by the Revenue Officer, as compared to the Scope Factors referred to in R17 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968. I have to choose the right person to be a lumberman. The level of education of a candidate, though not mentioned in the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968 R 17, in which one factor should be taken into account, but such appointments have the merits, qualifications and their overall status. Giving is one of the ideas of the Revenue Officer. The candidate's experience will weigh in on such an appointment process

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. Mst. AISHA 2014 SCMR 151
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOW COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE v. AYESHA WOOLEN MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED 2014 SCMR 154
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF SANGRI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 157
• CANTONMENT BOARD through Executive Officer, Cantt. Board, Rawalpindi v. IKHLAQ AHMED 2014 SCMR 161
• D.G. CUSTOMS VALUATION, KARACHI v. TRADE INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE 2014 PTD 174
• Mst. ROHAIFA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence 2014 PLD 174
• PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 176
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. v. MEMBER NIRC 2014 PLC 203

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

property advocate from Wazirabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes