Section 2 302 (b) Identification of the conviction evidence, conviction of the accused, the amount of the original accused was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court, which was upheld by the high court. , This was the case. That it identified the attacker. The exact time was mentioned by Godhra and cannot be interpreted in the dark by any other adjective. Prosecutor's witnesses and assailants were from the same village and the same area and knew each other, so, there can be no point. In such light, the prosecution's witnesses were related to the deceased but would not make their testimony untrustworthy when they had no interest or intent to falsely implicate the accused, according to the victim's post-mortem examination at the time of the report. ? The entries in the relevant documents but they could not justify excluding the testimony were not written with the mathematical accuracy of the prosecutor's testimony as of the time of the report. The retrieval of the ten vacancies from the scene will not have any negative effect on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, when the medical evidence showed that the firing was effective. An allegation against the accused proved beyond any shadow of a reasonable doubt, and that the reasons given by the trial court and the High Court for sentencing him were valid and valid, therefore, the Supreme Court found the accused The appeal was upheld and the conviction upheld. Was deleted
