MST. SHAZIA BEGUM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD
Article 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Recovery of Dowry's Articles, Dover and Restitution Allowance Wife sued in Family Court for dissolution of marriage on the basis of cruelty. To recover dowry articles; to recover gold jewelry, which was allegedly diverted but later taken away by her husband. For a homeowner's property that was allegedly transferred to Dover, and the family court's judgment for a sum of $ 6,000 / month restitution as a prayer for his wife's case, except for a restitution allowance. The edit period was extended to appellate court 3000 / month and then the High Court denied the wife to recover the articles related to dowry and only the Family Court verdict checking the validity of the marriage shows that the house or its No part of the party was ever gifted to the wife nor was she given a job. Rather, it is clearly and unambiguously mentioned that the evidence on record regarding the gold jewelry claim does not show that the jewelry that the wife received at the time of marriage was forcibly obtained by her husband. Was snatched from Regarding any dowry articles later, the husband filed a list of articles on dowry in the Family Court, which accepted such articles as part of his wife's pressure. With regard to the claim of restitution of the wife, the appellate court and the High Court did not give any reasonable reasons for discussing the evidence in this regard, so the judgment could not be sustained in accordance with the law. One lakh rupees
