Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE


Article 35 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 342 and 365 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, A. XXVI, R 1 by Moto Review Supreme Court Qatal Emad, wrongful imprisonment, abduction or abduction Intentionally and secretly intending to imprison a person Multiple crimes committed by the same accused of the same transaction / incident, simultaneous execution of death sentence, murder by the accused in the present case, false imprisonment And committed the kidnapping, which was part of the same transaction. And, as such, the convictions generally passed for such offenses should have been ordered to run together, such a matter escaped the notice of the Supreme Court, Deciding on the appeal of the accused Supreme Court in self-review, it was ordered that all convictions should be carried out together in such circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Takhtbai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.