Find a Lawyer

GENERAL (R) PARVEZ MUSHARRAF versus NADEEM AHMED (ADVOCATE)

Article 188 Review of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI Supreme Court decision, in which review applications were withheld over time. The case referred to in this case was prominent and the grounds requested by the applicants were neither within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court review nor applicable to the merit, so as to challenge interference in the decision. Granted, the requests were rejected,

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• Mst. NASEEM BEGUM v. STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 655
• INDEPENDENT MEDIA CORPORATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 657
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, BOR PUNJAB v. Syed HAROON IFTIKHAR 2014 SCMR 659
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE (II) PUNJAB, PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL 2014 SCMR 664
• HAROON MUHAMMAD KHAN v. RUKHSANA YASMEEN 2014 PLC(CS) 665
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. ZULFIQAR 2014 SCMR 667
• ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2014 PLD 668
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. State 2014 SCMR 668

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Mangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes