Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. GOHAR KHANUM versus MST. JAMILA JAN


Section 4 Trust Act (II of 1882), Sections 82, 89, 90, and 94 of a co-occupancy tenancy, owners pay compensation only for the acquisition of property rights by a co-owner of the affected tenant. Later, the son passed away, leaving a son (co-owner of the suit property) to pay for the ownership of the property in the suit property, resulting in the removal of the daughter exclusively in the name of the mutant son associated with the suit property. When entered, legal payment may be best for the son. The disputed property was treated as an act of a co-owner to acquire the property rights One of the motives for paying the son was to secure the property rights in the suit property in such cases by the son. Payment should also be seen as payment. Trustee as co-owner / daughter on the basis of Articles 82, 89, 90 and 94 of the Trust Act, 1882

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Sehar Baqlas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.