Find a Lawyer

SABIR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) of the statute of perjury has been declared guilty of a co-accused complying with the trial of the accused, on the basis of which the prosecution's legal case against the accompanying accused is the sole purpose of the prosecution. And based on his alleged fugitives. For a period of about 2 to 2 years, the Supreme Court found that there was practically no evidence against the co-accused, and thus he was acquitted of the charges, even in the case of the present accused, against the acquitted partner. Was better on the basis of ability. Since the only evidence presented by the prosecution against the accused was in the case of the alleged motive and in the circumstances the conviction of the accused was set aside and the accused was acquitted accordingly the appeal was allowed accordingly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• ALAM ZEB v. State 2014 PLD 760
• ISLAMABAD v. WAPDA 2014 PLD 766
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2014 PLD 783
• SHER BAHADUR v. FAYYAZ 2014 PLD 791
• Mst. HAJYANI BAR BIBI v. Mrs. REHANA AFZAL ALI KHAN 2014 PLD 794
• SANDOZ PAK LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2014 SCMR 796
• S. MASOOD ABBAS RIZVI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment 2014 SCMR 799
• Mst. GOHAR KHANUM v. Mst. JAMILA JAN 2014 SCMR 801

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

pakistani advocates Umer Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes