Sections 302 (b) and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (1) (b) and 7 (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 345 murder, joint intentions, terrorism The accused was arrested again by the accused and the co-accused after the conciliatory evidence was compromised, followed by one of the co-accused's screaming, which resulted in the victim's firing to be taken to the hospital, But the accused and the accomplices did not do so despite their presence. He was charged with death as a result of a government vehicle on the spot, and he intentionally shot the accused, and at the instigation of the co-accused, he deliberately shot and killed him. Shed her blood without offering any help. Lee expressed the common intention and object of the perpetrators and co-accused of the murder of the deceased at the hands of members of the law enforcement agency, and the terror, insecurity and panic in the hearts and minds of those who witnessed the scene. Made sense The accused had compromised the legal heirs of all those who watched the video of the incident, but the offense committed by his co-accused persons under section 7 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was not worthy of trial. Following the death of Mohammed Nawaz v. State (PLD 2014 SC 383), in which, under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the convict was sentenced to life imprisonment in the case of compromise. Sentencing should also be reduced to life in prison. The co-accused were sentenced to life imprisonment and accordingly the appeal was settled
