Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Miscellaneous No. 6012 in Writ Petition No. 666‑R of 1980, decided on 13th October, 1980.
‑‑‑ Art. 199‑‑Writ jurisdiction‑Disputed question of fact‑Held High Court while exercising constitutional jurisdiction normally does not, enter upon disputed questions of fact.‑[Question of fact].
‑‑ Art. 199 (a) (ii)‑Lawful authority ‑Court/authority having jurisdiction to decide a question, held, has jurisdiction to decide rightly or wrongly both in fact and law.‑[Jurisdiction].
Nawab Syed Raunaq Ali's case P L D 1973 S C 236 ref.
Ahmad Nawaz Khan Qaisarani for Appellants.
The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this application in view of the observations having been made during the course of hearing of the writ petition clearly indicating that the writ petition is being dismissed and in fact ultimately dismissed.
Disposed of accordingly.
Sardar Altaf Hussain Khan for Petitioners.
M. Parvez Akhtar for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.
Islam Ali Qureshi for Respondent No. 5.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer