Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SECRETARY, EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus RENT CONTROLLER


Section 17 (9) is read with the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VIII, r. The tenant is not filing a response when the tenant controller expires or does not appear on the date set for the hearing during the defense proceedings, the defense can be attacked. In the event of non-compliance with an order approved by the Rent Controller under Section 17 (8) Order VIII, r 10, the CPC is further withheld, does not apply to such case and the Rent Controller Defense Can't attack.

1981 C L C 1369

[Lahore]

Before Khurshid Ahmad, J

SECRETARY, EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND

3 OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

RENT CONTROLLER AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Writ Petitions Nos. 2795 and 2824 of 1979, decided on 11th November, 1979.

(a) Cantonments Refit Restriction Act (XI of 1963)‑--

‑‑ Ss. 27 (1) & 17 (8)‑Eviction order without inquiry‑Tenant either not appearing on date fixed fo; hearing :or not complying with order of filing reply to petition for eviction‑Defence struck off by Rent Controller and eviction ordered without holding inquiry‑Holding of inquiry by Rent Controller, held-mandatory although no particular way of holding. inquiry prescribed by any law.

Qazi Ahmad Khan v. Mrs S. Henry La l gird another 1976 S C M R 515 ; Kahdim Mohyuddin and another v. Ch. Rahmat Ali Nagra and another P L D 1965'S C 459 and Abdul Khaliq Qureshi v. Saeed Hassan Shah and 3 others 19 j 9 C L C 118 ref.

(b) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)‑---

‑‑ S. 17(9) read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VIII, r. 10‑Tenant not filing reply to petition for eviction or not appearing on date fixed for hearing‑Defence struck off by Rent Controller- Held, defence can be struck off by Rent Controller only in case of non‑compliance of order passed under S. 17(8)‑Order VIII, r. 10, C. P. C. further held, not applicable to such case and Rent Con troller cannot strike off defence.

Syed Abbas Ali Shah, Government Pleader (Punjab) for Appellant.

Syed Rashid Rahim for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 11th November, 1979.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Tharparkar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.