Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAID MUHAMMAD versus ALI HUSSAIN


_A XXII, r 4 The plaintiff's applicants and the three plaintiffs (partial) are required to declare possession of the claimants' land and to bring the defendants against the permanent injunction to prevent them from interfering with their possession. DISCLAIMER - Death of a plaintiff declares that each defendant is the owner of a specific share suit for separate and separate action reasons, not the death lawsuit and its legal representative on record, the suit is only partially And the plaintiff may file or join a separate lawsuit against each of the plaintiffs. In this case, a further suit can proceed to issue a final decision in the absence of a legal representative for the late defendant and partial mitigation does not affect the rest of the suit.

1981 C L C 1390

[Lahore]

Before Munawwar Elahee Rana, J

SAID MUHAMMAD‑Appellant

versus

ALI HUSSAIN ETC.‑‑Respondents

Civil Revision No. 468 of 1971, decided on.13th Match, 1978.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑------

_‑ O. XXII, r. 4‑Partial abatement of suit‑Petitioner and three ethers (plaintiffs) bringing suit against respondents (defendants) for declaring plaintiffs being in possession of land and for perpetual injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with their possession‑One defendant dying during pendency of suit and his Legal Representatives not brought on record‑Each defendant proclaiming to be owner of specified share‑ Suit based on distinct and separate causes of action‑‑Held, suit abated only partially and not in toto and plaintiffs could file separate suits against each defendant or join them in one suit‑Held further Suit could proceed to final adjudication in absence of Legal Representatives of deceased defendant and partial abatement did not affect rest of suit.‑[Abatement].

Wali and others v. Manak Ali and others P L D 1965 S C 651 ,fol.

Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan for Appellant.

Muhammad Akram Khawaja for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 11th March, 1978.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Chilas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.