Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Second Appeal from Original Order No. 276 of 1979, decided on 20th April, 1980.
‑‑‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a)‑‑‑‑Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑Landlord stating to have been carrying on business of stamp making alongwith his son in front of shop in dispute at foot of stairs on a strip-less than 2 feet belonging to Municipal Committee‑Statement held, quite sufficient to establish bona fides of landlord.
Haji Ghulam Muhammad v. Abdul Qadir P L D 1975 Lab. 200 ; Muhammad Siddique V. Mistri Muhammad Aslam P L D 1975 Lah. 308 and Mansoor Ahmad v. Bashir Hussain Babri P L D 1977 Lab. 346 rel.
‑ S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a) ‑‑‑Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑ Lanwlor6, held, cannot be deprived of benefit of his own shop for reason of having increased rent of shop previously.
------S. 13 (3) (a) (ii) (a) Eviction of tenant‑‑Bona fide requirement of landlord‑Earlier application for eviction filed when shop in suit ire joint ownership and not partitioned and application for eviction also jointly filed against tenant theft in occupation‑‑Shop later parti tioned and respondent‑landlord letting it out to appellant‑Contention that respondent having got shop vacated and not occupied same no application for eviction could be filed subsequently, held, devoid of force.
Malik Muhammad Nawaz for Appellant.
Sh. Khurshid Ahmad for Respondent.
Date of hearing : 20th April, 1980.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer