Find a Lawyer

SALMAN KHALIL versus STATE

Section 497 (5) of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 and 420 bail, petitioner's petitioner / complainant's plea was requested that he sought to argue before the trial court, but his The request for was denied. His request for cancellation of bail will not be pressured if the trial court is instructed to allow the complainant to address the court, the lawyer's argument is reasonable, the trial court He was instructed to listen to a lawyer. Decide whether the complainant and the pending request bail within a specified period

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• HASSAN ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI 2009 PTD 66
• SANESRA STAR SCREEN INDUSTRIES through Partner v. JAMIA MASJID EID GAH through Secretary 2009 CLC 67
• Mst. ZAIRA KHATOON v. Mst. KISHWAR JAMAL 2009 MLD 67
• ARIF KHAN alias BABO v. HONESTY FURNITURE EMPORIUM 2009 PLC 68
• SANOFI AVENTIS PAKISTAN LIMITED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department, Karachi 2009 PLD 69
• ABDUL KARIM alias KAROO v. State 2009 YLR 71
• MUHAMMAD KHALIL v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT M. S.T.K. DIVISION 2009 PLC 71
• Mst. HAMEEDA BEGUM alias HAMEEDEE v. State 2009 YLR 73

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

list of supreme court advocates from Astore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes