Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIL versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT M. S.T.K. DIVISION

Sections 2 (xxx), 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the Industrial and Joint Employment (Standing Orders), Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i), Section O and 12 Labor Appointments Perform their duties. Prevention of Complaint The appellant, who claimed that he was posted as a porter in BPS 2 in 1992, took the stand when he made some of the irregularities caused by all the record clerks and He noted the wrongdoing and complained to the authorities, he was hunted down and forcibly discharged from performing his duties, requesting the complaint filed by the appellant without writing. By this order, the Labor Court had rejected on the basis that he was not a "permanent employee", but was working on a vacancy arrangement on a daily wage, with the appellant completely unable to produce any appointment letter. had lived. Establishing a permanent job as a witness, has fully established that the appellant was temporarily hired as a porter on a work charge basis as this is the difference between a retainer serving the appellant. As a permanent employee under the circumstances, the appellant did not claim that he was `permanent worker ', could not be accepted, in which case no court was found to be illegal or impaired \ r \ n top advocate from Minchanabad lawyer