Find a Lawyer

MST. HAMEEDA BEGUM ALIAS HAMEEDEE versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Bail, was being held without trial on the accused's grant that he had a legitimate right to be found guilty if he was found guilty. Soon to be dealt with. The High Court was directed by the trial court to record the evidence of some witnesses. Such an exercise should have been conducted within four months, but not even two years had passed, no witness could be examined, which showed What was the lack of interest by the prosecution to bring the accused back home

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• SALMAN KHALIL v. State 2009 YLR 69
• SANOFI AVENTIS PAKISTAN LIMITED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Excise and Taxation Department, Karachi 2009 PLD 69
• ABDUL KARIM alias KAROO v. State 2009 YLR 71
• MUHAMMAD KHALIL v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT M. S.T.K. DIVISION 2009 PLC 71
• MUHAMMAD UBAID v. State 2009 YLR 75
• RAZA MUHAMMAD BHUTTO v. State 2009 MLD 76
• ABDUL WAHEED SIDDIQUI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law, Parliamentary affairs and Human Rights, Islamabad 2009 CLC 76
• ABDUL QADIR Alias BABOO v. State 2009 PCrLJ 79

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

divorce advocates from Parachinar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes