Find a Lawyer

SANESRA STAR SCREEN INDUSTRIES THROUGH PARTNER versus JAMIA MASJID EID GAH THROUGH SECRETARY

Section 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 11 and O VII, R 11, reversing the rule of trial by the prosecution, it was stated that there was a similar agreement between the same party before it. The cause of action was decided and the decision came. Final status was obtained, therefore, rejection was rejected. Rice Judeta's theory was of universal application, and on the basis of the principle that public policy demanded that the same cause should not be prosecuted for the same party a second time and that litigation should be abolished. Section 11 CPC was forbidden to try any case or case in which, directly and substantially in the preceding cases, between the same parties or between the parties under which they or any of them. It was claimed, under the same title, that the case could be tried for trial in the Magistrate's Court. The matter was later raised and heard, and finally the competent court ruled because the case was filed in the same case and against the same parties and since the judgment in the previous case. Was never approved, so it was finalized and the case was later subjected to the principle of race justiata, the High Court rejected the case under OVII, applying in the circumstances of R 11 CPC. Was allowed best law firms from Shankiari lawyer