ABDUL WAHEED SIDDIQUI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY LAW, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD
Arts 199 and 205 High Court Judges (Vacation, Pension and Privilege) Order (PO 3 of 1997), Offer, Para 14 High Court Judges (Pensionary Benefits) Order (PO 8 of 2007), Presented by Federal Law Shares Retirement Although the Constitutional Petition Judge Beneficiary was a retired Judge of the Federal Shariat Court, he sought to implement the Supreme Court-approved decision on which he was entitled to benefits after retirement. According to the oath 30 oath 1996, if the period was calculated from 30 1996 to 12 1996, then the period of three years expired on 29 years 1999, thus the report of termination of charge of 29 1999 1999, notified service on 26 12 1996. Was not before Because this was a formal withdrawal report that was typically prepared when transferring or retiring, the Supreme Court-approved decision deserved the benefits of his retirement as a federal judge. In such cases, a Shariah court petition was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
