MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUKHTIARKAR REVENUE, KOT GHULAM MUHAMMAD, DISTRICT MIRPURKHAS
A. XLI, R 27 and Section 115 Additional Evidence Principle Revision Court, jurisdiction to fill millions in litigation filed by the plaintiff was simultaneously rejected by the trial court and lower appellate court decisions and the two courts below. The orders approved by the plaintiff were suspended in the review request for additional evidence of a valid nature of the permit to submit additional evidence, which was being sought and / or brought on record, and Intent to fill XLI's lacon scope cannot be allowed at review stage, R27 CPC was limited to appeal D and cannot be allowed to increase The plaintiff failed to justify the application under O XLI; R 27 CPC The plaintiff did not approach the court with clear hands and avoided them. The sisters, who had a direct interest in the outcome of the proceedings, found no weakness in the decisions passed by the two courts under the warrant. High Court interference with amended jurisdiction denied in modified circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
