MST. YASMEEN versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH
Article 15 (2) (vii) and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request on the Personal Needs of the Landlord Landlady filed a request for eviction for the use of her daughter because her possession was insufficient. Due to which he may be married to the elder. Provide a daughter and a separate residence and that she lived in a room. The tenant admitted in cross-examination that the landlord's daughter who was married was living separately from her husband because he needed separate accommodation The evidence on the point of personal need was permanent even with the request that the landlord The daughter's daughter needed the premises for personal use The rent controller accepted the landlord's eviction request and ordered the eviction of the tenant, under which the appellate authority was granted, the harmony of the two courts. The results cannot be interrupted. When the evidence headed by the landlord was relevant to his case, it was requested in the eviction request that even if the landlord owns more than one landlord, it was his choice which had to be taken into account when A home will be needed for the use of her daughter when the matter falls with her prejudice and discretion. The two courts did not require interference; the tenant was instructed to vacate the premises within a stipulated period and transfer the physical possession to the landlord.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
