Find a Lawyer

M. AYUB versus FEDERATION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, GOVERNMENT O

Section 73 Export Promotion Bureau's quota for removal of subsequent markup in the event of breach of liability for the export of goods for the year related to the purchase by the claimant from the open market pursuant to a legally valid practice. Such quota is mentioned in favor of another company by the Quota Exporter Promotion Bureau application in the form of a quota transfer submitted to the Bureau in favor of another company without the quota expiry of such exchange by the Bureau. Certification, claim against the plaintiff's bureaucracy to lose its financing and to make profit on it If Q had any objection to such a transfer to the Export Promotion Bureau, then the claimant should have been informed immediately that the Bureau did not perform its duty to confirm such transfer and did not respond promptly. I was unsuccessful, the Plaintiff's Bureau expired at the end of the relevant year due to the Plaintiff's inaction. The suit was decided by a contract injured by a staff violation \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 MLD 611
• MOULA BUX v. ABDUL RAZAK CHANDIO 2009 YLR 612
• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. State 2009 MLD 614
• Mst. YASMEEN v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2009 YLR 615
• HUMAN SAFETY FOUNDATION through Authorized Representative v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 MLD 628
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM QURESHI 2009 CLD 629
• UNITED BANK LTD. v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2009 CLD 634
• KEHAR KHAN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AND EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE, KOTRI 2009 PCrLJ 634

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

online advocate from Chilas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes