NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus STATE
The denial of the accused on the basis of Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, exemption was not entitled to bail because the co-accused who was granted bail by the High Court was not named in the FIR. However, the accused was released even though the complainant did not support the prosecution's case and declared enmity by the prosecution, as well as the prosecution's witnesses, but the initial version of the case could not be dismissed, Where an FIR was filed immediately after the incident. ; And the weapons were recovered from the suspect, who allegedly made several injuries in a brutal double murder. The material witnesses' investigation remains, and there is sufficient material record to link the suspect to the crime. , He was not even entitled to a discount on bail. Although he was in custody for a long time
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Khanewal lawyer
