GHULAM ABBAS ZAIDI versus COL. RETD. SHAHBAZ-UL-HAQ
Section 12 law in this testimony (10 of 1984), Article 114, the specific performance of the contract to sell arbitrary relief, applied to Stupel to conceal material facts, the plaintiff asserting that he had paid a large sum and alleged that The defendant has refused to execute the sale in favor of it. The Plaintiff was that after confirming the title of the Plaintiff, he would have to pay a balanced consideration which was to be verified by the Plaintiff himself as he had already been provided with the copy of the allotment order in his mind. There was no doubt that the property belonged to the defendant. He had posted an advertisement for sale of the suit property before the plaintiff filed a lawsuit before the lower court to cancel the trial agreement, but withdrew during the approval of the present case but the former The defendant's memory of the case was not reported. Only after the fact for the filing was it brought to the lower court on record by the Chief Plaintiff in his examination and he had kept the certified copy of the plaintiff's memo and the act of the plaintiff was extremely inappropriate and Besides, because of the merits of this case, the plaintiff had concealed himself and separated himself from a relief from the High Court. Such material fact, as in the earlier case, was between one party and once the plaintiff himself concealed the agreement by a plea of the same relief before the court, he was required to change the position and file the documents. Was prevented from claiming enforcement of what he had tried to dismiss before the court itself and the plaintiff himself had to inquire and answer questions.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
