Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZIM versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Sanctions Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 460, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Bail, The names of the accused were not mentioned in the FIR, which was recorded nine hours after the incident. The characteristics of the accused persons in the FIR were not mentioned. Was detained, but his case was not finalized and only the complainant's evidence was filed. He said that the accused was not liable to delay the trial And from them is no institutional trial court was vacant, the trial court had refused bail to accused persons on the run. There were no compelling reasons for denying the bail to the accused and the accompanying defendants from the court, who were to be held in detention for more than 6 years without trial, and also by the court, which was bound. There was nothing but a closing trial within the stipulated time, but with the process of the law delaying the trial, especially when it was a misuse of the law or court process, we always guaranteed it. Recognized as a ground for approval. Justice was recognized as a fundamental right. Every offender had the right to stand trial in a timely manner. Justice delays denial of justice. The trial was an unlawful and delayed delay, not only an abuse of law and court process, but also access to justice. The fundamental right was also violated. Due to the difficulty of the accused law firms from Gojra lawyer