It was the habit of the complainant to file false cases against the accused, section 561A, 190 and 173 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 365 / 506B / 337A (i), which was dealt with on the basis of the report submitted. Was. When the investigating officer received a report for approval, the Deputy District Public Prosecutor, despite verifying his opinion, directed the Investigation Officer to submit the invoice directly to the court magistrate, without judiciary. Approved a prosecution order without applying the mind, scrutinizing the law and records, violating the principles of the No.1 law of justice, and the magistrate thereby recording the case without any compelling reason and without any reason. Failing to act at its discretion in a lawful manner was an understatement. In the investigative report, the magistrate was required by law to give reasons for a fair, fair, fair and reasonable justification. The order was not guaranteed under the law, and accordingly the order was dismissed according to the order of the District Public Prosecutor, and not according to the district public prosecutor.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
