Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD ASLAM SIDDIQUI versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI

Article 199 Constitution Petition for Plot Allotment Charges Authorities Demand Charges for Allotment Plot was Vague The respondent did not provide any details about the nature of the charges payable by the applicant but the authorities No law was cited by. How and how they could be directed to the applicant to pay the outstanding dues which were taken by the authorities was not clear and the petitioner's request was denied. Yes, the authorities were directed by the High Court to perform all other formalities in the direction of transfer of possession of the plot lying in favor of the applicant.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• TARIQ HABIB v. State 2009 YLR 1364
• HABIB BANK LTD. through Authorized Attorneys v. WISDOM EDUCATION SYSTEM (PVT.) LTD. 2009 CLD 1367
• Haji BASHIR AHMED BABBAR v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION NORTHERN JAMRAO DIVISION MIRPURKHAS, SINDH 2009 MLD 1368
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2009 YLR 1370
• NIAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1376
• IZHAR MUHAMMAD v. MEMON HOUSING SERVICES through Partner 2009 MLD 1378
• Syed AKHLAQ AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 1382
• MUHAMMAD BABAR v. AL-ASR ENTERPRISES through Administrator 2009 MLD 1383

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Sukkur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes