Find a Lawyer

KHALID MEHMOOD versus STATE

Section 616161 Order / Termination of Proceedings Since the allegations against the applicants were that there were four cartoons in his premises, unless the witness and the investigating officer were examined, it could not be said that the applicant was not involved in the matter. I was not involved and had no chance. His sentence covers the length of the case (16 years) unless it is shown that there is no possibility of punishment.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• EDWARD HENRY LOUIS v. Dr. MUTAMMAD SAFDAR 2009 PCrLJ 1359
• TARIQ HABIB v. State 2009 YLR 1364
• HABIB BANK LTD. through Authorized Attorneys v. WISDOM EDUCATION SYSTEM (PVT.) LTD. 2009 CLD 1367
• Haji BASHIR AHMED BABBAR v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION NORTHERN JAMRAO DIVISION MIRPURKHAS, SINDH 2009 MLD 1368
• Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM SIDDIQUI v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2009 YLR 1374
• NIAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1376
• IZHAR MUHAMMAD v. MEMON HOUSING SERVICES through Partner 2009 MLD 1378
• Syed AKHLAQ AHMED v. State 2009 YLR 1382

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sara e Naurang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes