Find a Lawyer

NIAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

In view of the fact that Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 504, 148, 149 and 114 guarantees the grant of further inquiry to the grant of bail to the accused. Counter-lawsuits exist. Both sides had registered two FI rupees from both sides as both sides suffered injuries. This was a case of two counter-narcotics arising out of such incidents, in the wake of the counter-cases, the question of which version of the two FIs was correct and which party was the aggressor. And which party was the victim of aggression, the case should be decided by the trial court only after extensive evaluation of the evidence filed by it and not at the bail-out stage, but usually further investigation into such cases. Was guaranteed on the basis of this question. As regards which version was right, it should be decided when, in the case of the counter version, the two sides offered private defense, which raised the question of who was the assailant and Which party was accused of aggression? On the basis of further investigation under Section 497 (2) of the Outcome Section, CCP accused were granted bail, under the circumstances. criminal advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer