Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE, RAWALPINDI versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

Article 115 The court exercises its amending power under section 115, the CPC may exercise its own motion to review the motion on its own motion or on the request by an affected party where the revising power is the natural guardian of the nature. And was discretionary. The court had the power to review a court's decision by a subordinate court to rectify any wrongdoing or misconduct. The use of such power was enforceable where the court itself found any error of the nature provided in Section 115, CPC where it was without prejudice. Of a party aggrieved by a court order or decision

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2014

• Malik MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2014 SCMR 1349
• FAZAL UR REHMAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer (Revenue) Bhakkar 2014 SCMR 1351
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2014 SCMR 1353
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. State 2014 SCMR 1355
• MUHAMMAD TABISH NAEEM KHAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2014 SCMR 1365
• Mian MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2014 SCMR 1369
• NADEEM AKHTAR TABASUM v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 2014 SCMR 1371
• MUHAMMAD ZAHAR SHAH v. State 2014 SCMR 1374

All Supreme Court judgments of 2014 →

top advocate from Kotri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes