Section 10 (3), 15 (2) (vii) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition on the basis of instability in payment of rent and removal of the personal requirement of the tenant, the Controller excludes the removal request Cordy, who was beaten before the appellate court, who concluded that he needed a shop to personally use his son for good use, on the refusal of the landlord to receive the rent in question, The tenant sent the rent through a money order, which also refused, the tenant resorted to the issue of miscellaneous rent; The tenant of the Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 successfully removed its burden in accordance with the mode set forth in Section 10 (3). Under the circumstances the payment of premises rent was not defaulted. Landy had evacuated two shops from the same building and rented to other tenants so as to demonstrate good faith and good faith in the landlord's part. Extensive facts must be dismissed The disclosure request discloses that the opposing party may be given an opportunity to have the facts obtained by the realization of one or more stores in connection with the eviction proceedings. The hidden issue has a negative impact on his personal needs. The goodwill that would be detrimental to his case was Landy's offer to choose a particular shop for his personal profession, however, the landowner had more than one cover to use. It was his duty to provide satisfactory or satisfactory explanations. When its other shops were occupied and occupied
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
