YAZDANI ENGINEERING INDUSTRY versus APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Sections 45 (2) and 196 Appeal to the High Court to remedy the error in the import manifesto Appellant's name was shown in the invoice bill of the Leading and Import Permit, however, in the manifesto prepared by the shipping agent, the appellant A name other than that was written. Upon discovery of this error, the appellant directed the shipping agent to submit an application under section 45 (2) of the Customs Act, 1969, which did not permit the modification request and the appellate tribunal also The refusal of the amendment was upheld, the appellant filed an appeal with the High Court's validity in the name of all the imported documents, the appellant's written name was the result of a mistake in adding the name of the appellant, which was the customs act, Under section 45 (2) of the 1969 Act, the appellate tribunal's denial was not justified by the appellant's appeal. Allow Ma'am, would copy of the court's decision was sent to the Appellate Tribunal shall modify its order. Rdance with High Court Search
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
