SYED AFSAR ALI versus PAKISTAN EXPORT FINANCE GUARANTEE AGENCY LIMITED
Articles 9, 19 and 22 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), the application for the terms of the arrest of the debtor for the execution of the section 55 suit order for recovery of debt, came from an order approved by the court of enforcement. An arrest warrant was issued against the creditor of the judgment. The mortgaged property was sold and some money was recovered and the balance amount was to be returned as well. According to the sum of money, the debtor assured and issued the check, which cannot be appreciated, the court passed the order imprisonment for the judgment, which filed an appeal against the order. He deposited the money with the Nazir of the court and demanded his release, however he was appealed, however, he was rejected due to illegal prosecution and filed a restitution petition, which was filed by the respondents. Was issued in which the lawyer of the financial institution said that the financial institution was interested in it. There was no objection to the recovery of the declared amount and if the appeal was reinstated and I was dealt with the statement of the financial institution, the court reinstated the appeal and decided only for hearing, The decision-maker could not be ordered to imprison simply because he was unable to fulfill the decree only when the imprisonment order was to be granted. The lender of the judgment became dishonest and hid his financial resources from which he could fulfill the decree. Out of the balance directive amount, the judgment debtor submitted some money to the court, which included the cost of future funds, all the sources of his income before the court's imposed execution of the judgment.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
