Find a Lawyer

COMSET SERVICES LIMITED versus HOLGER HAHN

Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 20 and 96 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 The jurisdiction of the parties in determining the jurisdiction of the parties in the jurisdiction determines the agreement between the parties Filed a lawsuit on the basis and also claimed recovery. In damages High Court, a single judge decided in favor of plaintiff by the defendant that according to the agreement between the parties, only the courts in the UK had jurisdiction to decide on the matter, so the agreement was implemented in Pakistan. was done. The approval of the disputed jurisdiction between the non-parties under scrutiny under the law of the land does not remove the jurisdiction of the local courts, nor can the consent of the parties give jurisdiction to a court under which the parties Les has no choice but to entertain and decide. The service agreement between the parties was not obtained on the trigger date, therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to any equity. The salary or allowances which were payable after the acquisition of the trigger date were only payable for 12 months in lieu of the notice received. It was also entitled to a housing allowance and was not entitled to the entire claim made by the single judge division bench of the High Court. The High Court of Appeal amended the Single Judge's order patent advocate from Madinah lawyer