PAKISTAN INSULATIONS (PVT.) LTD. versus RANHILL ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS DDFC GROUP OF COMPANIES THROUGH GENERAL PAKISTAN OPERATIONS MANAG
Before attaching the garnishee order property before requesting O XXI, R 46 and O XXXVIII, R 5, the attached garnishee of the property could have been approved in the execution under O XXI, R 46, CPC but only Only after this loan could it be judicially determined where the plaintiff was. According to a disputed claim, it came under Order O. XXXVIII, R 5, CPC, which authorized the court to properly attach before the judgment, however, such an order could not be granted lightly. And the person looking for it must fulfill it. The court, through an affidavit, or in any other way, that the defendant may not dispose of the entire or any part of his property or that the defendants have the whole or any part of his property in the local jurisdiction of the court There is a risk of removal. XXXVIII, R 5, CPC was not only that the court should be satisfied about it, but also that the defendant intended to do so with the intent of obstructing or delaying any decree which might be attached to the indication. The claim cannot be made merely on the basis that the defendant was a foreigner and did not have any assets in Pakistan where there was nothing in the record to show that any property was disposed of. Is about to go An application for the acquisition of a garnishee order was dismissed with the intention of obstructing or delaying the execution of an order which could have been granted in favor of the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
