Find a Lawyer

VIJAY KUMAR versus STATE

Section 616161 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 276, 34, 406 and 420 Drug Act (XXXI of 1976), Section 30 The request for an action dismissal was not made in the FIR that the applicants Was found to be selling various drugs and the allegation against the applicants was that they were found with some official stamped drugs while Adidia was not disputed. In such a situation, section 6276, PPC was to be applied while the components of sections 6406 and 202020, PPC, were not attracted to the fact that under the provisions of the Drug Act, 1976, the drugs act was already serious. Under section 30, 1976, it was provided that only one drug court had to take serious action on the offense, which stated that when an applicant faces a trial before a drug court. The prosecution would have been better for prosecution than the conviction that it had been and the allegations contained in this FIR. Given the fact that the factual position was involved while the set of evidence was the same, the double trial was not allowed on the basis of the trial by the Magistrate's Court, given the fact that the plaintiff was sued before the court. Has been canceled. best law firms from Qalandarabad lawyer