Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALIAS BABLOO versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, grant of bail application was suppressed mainly due to hardship and delay, the accused were in custody for the last four years, but so far in this case The long delay could not proceed. The trial itself would be an abuse of the court process as the defendants had a fundamental right to a fair and speedy trial and no one could be detained in jail indefinitely, the accused was admitted on bail. I

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SHOAIB v. Mst. FOUZIA 2009 YLR 1073
• Mian SARERAZ AHMED ANJUM v. BANKING COURT No.IV through Presiding Officer 2009 CLD 1074
• PAKISTAN INSULATIONS (PVT.) LTD. v. RANHILL ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS DDFC GROUP OF COMPANIES through General Pakistan Operations Manag 2009 CLD 1077
• VIJAY KUMAR v. State 2009 MLD 1078
• JAMIL UR REHMAN v. ANISUR REHMAN 2009 MLD 1082
• MEHMOOD LAKHANI v. Syeda ZUBAIDA KHATOON 2009 YLR 1083
• ZULQARNAIN SIKANDAR v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1089
• PROVINCE OF SINDH v. SHAMS-UL-HASSAN 2009 MLD 1093

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes