Find a Lawyer

ANWAR AHMED versus NIB BANK LIMITED

Article 199 Constitutional petition creates harassment to the applicant as the bank has its sole institution for taking no action against the applicant in the event of payment of the outstanding loan amount by the banker and the consumer - the future of any person No speculation will be taken against the will of the petitioner. And if necessary, the bank can still take legal action against it

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• MUHAMMAD HANIF SHAIKHANI v. MUHAMMAD KHALID SHAFI 2009 CLD 1129
• MUHAMMAD ATIQ v. State 2009 YLR 1136
• CITIZEN FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT and others v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2009 YLR 1137
• ABDUL KARIM v. State 2009 YLR 1140
• ALLAH DINO v. State 2009 YLR 1144
• FARM SERVICES SYNDICATE v. RAJBY INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. 2009 MLD 1145
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS BALOCH v. Mian PERVEZ AKHTAR 2009 YLR 1145
• MUMTAZ alias MASHOOQ v. State 2009 YLR 1151

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Kabir Wala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes