MUHAMMAD HANIF SHAIKHANI versus MUHAMMAD KHALID SHAFI
Section 7979 and Civil 80 Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), Section 34 and A. XXXVII, R 2 Promising Recovery Notes Ex-decree interest, original promissory note from the execution of the plaintiff, legal notice, postal receipt, allotment of flat The application form for the respondent was signed and the sub-lease of the flats was chosen by the defendant to be absent and he failed to appear in court and failed to obtain leave to defend the case, e.g. Provided that under O XX VII, R 2 (2) CPC effect was deemed to be the plaintiff's allegation and he was entitled to the injunction It was based on notes that were a source of negotiation and the idea was also issued against deliberations and the defendants rejected the High Court decision in the amount claimed with interest at 6%. Did not come forward for Each year, from the date of interest-related annuity at the rate of 10 of every year, from the date of duty till now, in accordance with Sections 79 and 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the date of the annual interest-rom date of section 10, when section 34 The payment was realized according to the CPC suit and an order was issued accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
