The first appeal of the delay in the execution of sections 19 and 22 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the delay of execution of the provisions of section 3 and 5, delayed the appeal which was filed 11 days after the expiry of the limitation period. Attempted to enter for a hearing. The holder cannot file a request for a certified copy of the non-deferred order because the file was present in the presiding officer's chamber for the purpose of writing the order, so as to allow the appeal to be filed after the expiry of the prescribed limit. For this, two questions were very appropriate to consider: first, whether the court has the authority to do so. Secondly, whether the appellant had reason to refuse the appeal under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, provided that the appeal, etc., could be filed after the limitation period, when the appellant could satisfy the court that Has good reason for that. Prioritizing or not appealing the appeal within that period, it does not matter if there is a reason for an individual not to appeal within the stipulated period, even if the limitation of that period is Whether the imprisonment granted by the Act of 1908 or the inadequacy of the law or the inadequacy of the cause by anyone else depends on the nature of the purpose and not the law specifying a limitation period. It would be unreasonable to say that the purpose of the legislature is to recognize the appeals filed after the expiry of the limitation period set by the Limitation Act. 1908 and not recognizing the appeals for which the statute of limitations was set by another law was right of appeal. No important technical right cannot be denied any important right and while interpreting any law. Its health
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
